Greenspace Alliance of Canada's CapitalThe story and thread below are about the activities of the 2006 NCC Mandate Review Panel and the Coalition for NCC Renewal that was formed to respond to it; and to later related developments up to October 2007.
Much has changed for the better since then, under the leadership of CEO Marie Lemay, including open Board meetings, and other events such as the Greenbelt Visioning workshop, all webcast.
In June 2009, the Government introduced legislation that dealt with some of the issues discussed in the Panel report. (This became Bill C-37, which did not make it out of a House Committee before prorogation in December 2009.) The proposals included a determination of the boundaries of Gatineau Park and more freedom to engage in land transactions. Not included was a key Panel recommendation that NO further land sales should take place, unless to another level of government and then with covenants for environmental protection; however, it did make provisions for regulations regarding adding or removing land from the National Interest Land Mass (NILM). Please refer to a newswire story for full details.
Also in 2009 the NCC initiated a review of the 1996 Greenbelt Master Plan. Again a Coalition of environmental groups has been formed to influence this process. For more information, please visit the web site of the Greenbelt Coalition of Canada's Capital Region. See also the Links page under Local Governments.
E.D. 31 December 2009 (rev. 26 February 2010)
NCC MANDATE REVIEW PANEL
Early in 2006, Minister Lawrence Cannon, the federal minister responsible for the National Capital Commission, let it be known that the mandate of the NCC would be reviewed. Members of the Alliance immediately went to work on forming a coalition of environmental groups to hammer out a position on this matter. The "Coalition for NCC Renewal" began meeting in May and developed four papers: on Gatineau Park, on the Greenbelt, on NCC Land Holdings other than the Park and the Greenbelt, and on Governance.
Official announcement of the Review was on April 13. Composition and Terms of Reference were announced on August 2. (The Panel's web site was closed down six months after delivery of its report. To obtain a copy of all submissions, contact the Office of Crown Corporation Governance at Transport Canada at (613) 991-2998.)
The Coalition's submission, on behalf of ten organizations, is available here (303 KB). Its Annex D, the Coalition's paper analyzing the NCC's land holdings outside the Gatineau Park and the Greenbelt, was also published, in slightly modified form, in the July-September 2007 issue of the Ottawa Field-Naturalists' Trail & Landscape.
The Alliance's Poets' Pathway Committee also made a submission to the Review Panel. More on this here.
The Panel held two public consultation sessions, on November 9 and 15. It is expected to present its report to Minister Cannon in December.
Erwin
Nov 25, 2006
P.S.: Back in 2003, Amy Kempster wrote a history and analysis of the NCC's interaction with the (old) City of Ottawa's planning -- Official Plan and Zoning -- under the evocative title: "National Capital Commission: Protector of Greenspace or Protector of Developer Rights?" Read her article here.
Comments
New appointments at the NCC
On October 12, 2007, Minister Cannon, the Minister responsible for the NCC, announced new appointments at the Commission. Ms. Marie Lemay was appointed Chief Executive Officer (replacing Micheline Dubé, who remains Executive Vice-President); and former Ottawa Mayor Jacquelin Holzman and financial advisor Kory Bobrow were appointed to a 2-year and 4-year term on the Commission respectively. Like Ms. Holzman, Mr. Bobrow hails from the National Capital Region.
Ms. Lemay has been CEO of the Canadian Council of Professional Engineers since 2000 and has worked for the City of Gatineau and the Township of Chelsea. Her term is for five years, starting January 7, 2008.
Press releases from Transport Canada:
on the appointment of the new CEO:
http://www.tc.gc.ca/mediaroom/releases/nat/2007/07-h194e.htm
on the appointment of the two new Directors:
http://www.tc.gc.ca/mediaroom/releases/nat/2007/07-h193e.htm
Press coverage: Patrick Dare in The Citizen of October 13, 2007, page E3.
Erwin Dreessen
New wind blowing at the NCC
On September 12, 2007, Chair Russell Mills and Acting CEO Micheline Dubé announced a number of initiatives that promise to foster more openness and transparency by the NCC:
- all 'regular' (quarterly) Board meetings will be open to the public, starting November 7. Agendas will be made available in advance and Minutes will be posted on the NCC web site;
- Public Standing Committees will be instituted. These committees will consist of "individuals with a variety of backgrounds, such as general public, interest groups, scholars or professionals, who would be selected on the basis of applications submitted in response to a call for interest." The public will be able to participate in the deliberations of these committees and a summary of their input will be presented to the Board at their quarterly meetings. Suggested areas of interest of such Committees are Culture, Heritage, Gatineau Park, Greenbelt, Core Area, Urban Lands, and Transportation;
- an external ombudsman function will be created to investigate and address complaints from individual citizens;
- the NCC will hold an annual Open House where the public can meet the CEO and staff. The CEO will also be "opening her office doors" several times a year to meet members of the public;
- efforts to encourage an on-going dialogue between the CEO and the mayors of Ottawa and Gatineau will be renewed;
- the NCC's web site will be enhanced to provide better information to the public.
In addition, the open Annual General Meetings (held since 2001 in the fall) and Meetings of the Board with Interest Groups (held since 2002 in the spring) will continue. However, the latter will now also be open to the general public. There will continue to be a requirement to submit briefs in advance.
You are invited to fill out a 2-page questionnaire to tell the NCC what you think of their initiatives and to give them further suggestions. You are asked to respond before October 12, 2007.
For all information, including the questionnaire, go to www.ncc-ccn.gc.ca/consultation. Be aware that several elements noted above were culled from information only provided in the text of the questionnaire!
Comment
Several of these initiatives are in line with recommendations made by the Mandate Review Panel in its report issued last December. The key deviation is with regard to the proposed Public Standing Committees. The Panel had recommended that the NCC's existing Advisory Committees begin to function much like Committees of City Council, with public meetings and submissions by the public, that the Chairs of these Committees become members of the Board, and that, if the Board would not accept a recommendation from a Committee, it would have to justify this in writing. While Board composition (and selection criteria -- expertise rather than political connections) are likely outside the power of the NCC to change, whatever these Public Standing Committees will turn out to be is without doubt a far cry from seeing them function as the Board's Advisory Committees, let alone in the way the Panel envisaged it.
The reference to renewed efforts of dialogue with the mayors of Ottawa and Gatineau is an implicit admission that the Tri-Partite Committee has not functioned well. The public has been left in the dark about when this Committee met and what was being discussed, apart from an off-camera summary by the Chair at the AGM. There is still no promise that this "renewed effort" will include more openness and transparency.
It also remains to be seen what Board business will be conducted outside the public's view. While few will object to in camera discussion of personnel or litigation matters, what about budgets and land sales, for example? According to an article in The Ottawa Citizen of September 13, the NCC is going to propose that it be given more authority to buy or sell land. (At present, it needs Treasury Board approval for any purchase over $25,000 and any sale over $10,000.) This is a move to be watched. It is interesting to note that Conservative MP Poilièvre thinks that such increased authority is not necessary. He sees no problem with the NCC holding a public discussion on big financial items, prior to submission to Treasury Board. We couldn't agree more. The Greenspace Alliance has long maintained that there is no reason whatsoever why proposed sales of public land could not be discussed in public.
While these initiatives are certainly a good start, there is a long way to go, even on goverance issues, e.g., Board composition and qualifications for appointment. (This is a point made by MP Paul Dewar, as quoted in The Citizen.) As well, there is much left on the table before one can be truly confident that the NCC has been renewed. The status and management of Gatineau Park and the issue of so-called surplus lands come to mind. The Coalition for NCC Renewal plans to lobby further for changes in these and other areas.
Erwin Dreessen
13 September 2007
NCC initiates Urban Lands study, again
The Citizen reported on June 19, 2007 that the NCC has advertised for a consulting firm to study federal land holdings in the National Capital Region outside Gatineau Park and the Greenbelt. The study is expected to start in a month and be completed in a year. (Read the article here.)
NCC Director of Planning François Lapointe puts this study in the context of the Commission's Capital Urban Lands Master Plan. This Plan has seen two previous false starts over the last ten years.
This time, however, it may manage to proceed. It is yet another implementation of one of the recommendations of the NCC Mandate Review Panel, namely that the Commission's so-called "surplus lands" be thoroughly evaluated. This new $175,000 study has an even wider scope, however, as it will include all federal land holdings, not just those that are on the NCC's books. (On the other hand, it is not clear whether NCC or other federal land holdings in rural areas will be covered.)
An analysis of the NCC's so-called surplus land holdings is in Annex D of the submission by the Coalition for NCC Renewal (303 KB; Annex D is on pages 35-48. This piece was, in slightly modified form, published in the July-September 2007 issue of Trail & Landscape, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 160-172.)
Year-and-a-half old information about the Capital Urban Lands Master Plan can be found on this page of the NCC's web site. There is no press release nor any other information about the new study on the site.
Rejoice: There will be three public meetings, two in Ottawa and one in Gatineau.
Erwin Dreessen
23 June 2007 (updated 17 July 2007)
New NCC Chair appointed
On May 3, 2007, Min. Cannon announced the appointment of the new Chair of the National Capital Commission, Mr. Russell A. Mills. See the NCC's press release here. The welcoming words were spoken by Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Micheline Dubé.
Wikipedia says about Mr. Mills in a "stub" (not quite a full article):
Russell Mills (born July 14, 1944, in St. Thomas, Ontario) is a former Canadian newspaper publisher. He served as publisher of the Ottawa Citizen for sixteen years before being fired in 2002 by the newspaper's owners, CanWest Global, after a Citizen editorial calling for then-Prime Minister of Canada Jean Chrétien to resign after the paper published a series of articles exposing a financial scandal.
Mills earned two degrees from the University of Western Ontario. His first was a bachelor's degree in general arts in 1967, and his second was a master's degree in sociology in 1968. Mills then joined the Ottawa Citizen in 1971 and would work for them for three decades.
He rose to become publisher of the Citizen in 1986, and was soon promoted to president of the Southam Newspaper Group in 1989. He kept this position until 1992 when he returned to the Citizen to again serve as publisher. He held this position until 2002.
The day prior to being fired, Mills received an honorary degree from Carleton University. He soon became a Nieman Fellow at Harvard University.
Mills now serves as the Dean of the School of Media and Design at Algonquin College in Ottawa, Ontario.
Meanwhile, still no word from the Minister's office about the recommendations from the Mandate Review Panel.
Erwin Dreessen
31 May, 2007
Federal Budget allocates more money to the NCC
Th March 19, 2007 Federal Budget Plan had this paragraph on the National Capital (p. 73)
Preserving the National Capital
The National Capital Commission (NCC) safeguards and preserves the Capital’s most treasured cultural and natural heritage assets for future generations. As noted by the NCC Mandate Review Panel, funding in recent years has not been sufficient for the NCC to maintain these assets. Budget 2007 proposes to address these needs by providing $30 million on a cash basis in capital and operating funding over the next two years to the NCC. On a budgetary basis, this amounts to $11 million.
The NCC Mandate Review Panel had recommended that the Commission be given an extra $25 million per year, so they got about half. Still, they are now in a better position to abandon further land sales - another of the Panel's major recommendations.
What the government will do with this and other recommendations of the Panel remains to be seen.
Erwin Dreessen
26 March 2007
Panel report published
The Mandate Review Panel released its report on December 21, 2006.
[Update - 12 Nov 2007:] Download the Report (5.6 MB) from the NCC's web site.
Download the Press Release and Prof. Gilles Paquet's remarks.
CBC.ca news item, December 21.
Articles in The Citizen, December 22, 2006, section D - City:
http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/city/story.html?id=763f75aa-5d2f-4a4d-9ef9-ff996262e65f&k=54690
"'Incredible opportunity' to improve capital" http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/city/story.html?id=b7397f57-fca9-46fb-968d-f557d19793e8&k=45418
Erwin Dreessen commented to Coalition chair Sol Shuster on December 22:
We should strongly welcome the report's recommendations, in particular:
- a strengthened and more focused mandate;
- the need for a rigorous definition ("a Charter") and public process around National Interest Land Mass status;
- the end of land sales, even if determined to be "surplus";
- a municipal consultative committee (MCC) of senior officials, advising the NCC Board - and if the advice is not heeded, they must explain...
- the Board's Advisory Committees (4 identified) acting like municipal standing committees: in a public process;
- chairs of the Advisory Committees to be on the NCC Board;